🔗 Share this article

South Africa's supreme judicial authority has collectively determined that both mothers and fathers of newborn children are entitled to identical parental leave - a historic decision celebrated as a major victory for gender equality and family rights.

Current Legislative Disparity

According to the existing legislation, female parents are granted one-third of a year of time off, while dads get just 10 days.

In its judgment, the supreme tribunal stated parts of the legislation unconstitutional, describing it as biased against dads, and decided that all caregivers may now distribute the granted leave according to their preferences.

"This constitutes a pioneering move for fairness, family wellbeing, and the future of paternal care in the country," said Sthembiso Phakathi, establishment figure of a parental rights group.

Judicial History

Last year, a inferior tribunal ruled certain sections of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and the insurance law unfair and decided that they violated the rights of various parental arrangements.

The regional tribunal then determined that the regulation unfairly treated kinds of parents differently regarding the duration of parenting time and unemployment benefits granted.

Judicial Case

The lawsuit was initiated by a married couple, the Commission for Gender Equality and other petitioners, who sought to address the unfair societal burden mainly affecting female parents, emphasizing that caregiving tasks should be divided.

The petitioners argued that the current legislation showed bias against caregivers who were other than the biological mother - specifically, dads, guardians, and parents of infants delivered by substitute mothers - by providing them merely a brief period of parenting time, while the biological mother got 120 days.

Judicial Explanation

Announcing the ruling on this week, Judge Tshiqi said that all caregivers should be eligible for share the provided period as they deemed appropriate, describing the present regulations obsolete and one which "unfairly burdened female parents and excluded fathers".

"The shielding of birth mothers to the elimination of other parents has the detrimental effect of sustaining the presumption that mothers are, and should be, the main guardians of babies.

"The dad is sidelined and deprived of the chance to engage as a caregiver in the nurturing of the infant during the formative months of growth," she continued.

Judge Tshiqi said the judgment was not just about gender equality but also about protecting the respect of families, emphasising that the ultimate focus of the court's decision was the health of babies.

"The unequal treatment not only sidelines caregivers but also denies children of the possibility to be with their guardians during a important phase of development and acclimatization to their different situation."

Reactions and Ramifications

The applicants welcomed the ruling, while legal experts cautioned that the decision would have major ramifications for companies, who will have to modify their existing absence rules to follow the judgement.

"The core of the case is that it underscores the requirement to grant identical parental leave benefits, acknowledging that caring for a baby is a collective task," Tsietsi Shuping from the equality body informed the press.

He commented the present regulations "did not acknowledge developing community standards around child-rearing".

Workplace legal expert a specialist stated to official outlets that the judgment was "a positive and expected outcome" for family privileges in the country.

Application Timeline

The tribunal has suspended its ruling of unconstitutionality for three years, allowing parliament opportunity to modify the existing legislation to comply with its ruling.

In the meantime, parents will be entitled to determine how they wish to share the specified period of time off.

When just one caregiver is working, that caregiver may utilize the complete time off allowance.